– Restore local land use control: League of California Cities votes on key resolution Sept. 24, 25 – UPDATED

Update October 1, 2026:
The resolution to restore local land use control was approved by the League of California Cities General Assembly on September 25.

Our Neighborhood Voices (ONV) posted this update today
https://www.ourneighborhoodvoices.com/you-made-it-happen-resolution-for-local-control-wins-at-calcities/

There is a great deal of work ahead. From ONV:

The resolution brought together communities to discuss concerns about the destructive impact of state housing mandates. Before it got to the final vote, however, the resolution was revised in committee, and the original reference to a state constitutional amendment was removed. (This may be added back in at a later date.)

ONV believes a constitutional amendment needs to be part of that discussion. Also, while the current resolution looks toward 2030, ONV will continue advocating to bring the issue before voters in 2028.

– – – – – – – –

On Thursday and Friday, Sept. 24, 25, the League of California Cities votes on a resolution to restore local control over planning and land use projects.

Please contact your city council and council representative to the LCC to vote YES on this resolution. It is the only resolution on their agenda.

Resolution on page 8:
https://www.calcities.org/docs/default-source/advocacy/2026-cal-cities-resolution-packet.pdf?sfvrsn=36139ca0_1

1. A RESOLUTION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES CALLING FOR A WORKING GROUP TO CONSIDER A STATE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OR OTHER FORM OF INITIATIVE TO ENSURE FINAL LOCAL AUTHORITY OVER HOUSING AND LAND USE DECISIONS

Let the public and other officials know about this important vote, including nearby cities. Officials may not know about this critical resolution.

The California Legislature is taking greater control over local decisions. In 2017 SB 649 would have allowed small cell towers everywhere by state mandate, eliminating local control. Through collective action, the public defeated that bill. A big issue is housing, with densification pushed by the Legislature and Governor Newsom via SB 79 and other bills, the so-called “builder’s remedy”, eliminating hearings and environmental review, and FCC-like shot clocks for rapid approval. These projects can destroy community character and contribute little to affordable housing. Another land use issue is the recent lithium ion battery energy storage facility preemption by the state. The Moss Landing BESS had a new fire September 18, but the legislature stripped cities and counties of authority to pull the plug or deny projects.

The resolution will be voted on at the annual LCC Conference in Anaheim. The LCC Resolution Committee will vote on the resolution Thursday, and if passed, it will go to the General Assembly for a vote Friday, September 25. The organization Our Neighborhood Voices is sponsoring a rally at their booth on Wednesday
https://www.ourneighborhoodvoices.com/press-release-our-neighborhood-voices-to-take-fight-for-local-control-to-league-of-california-cities-annual-conference-in-anaheim/– press release

Please lobby your city and nearby cities to vote YES.

Resolution:
https://www.calcities.org/docs/default-source/advocacy/2026-cal-cities-resolution-packet.pdf?sfvrsn=36139ca0_1

1. A RESOLUTION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES
CALLING FOR A WORKING GROUP TO CONSIDER A STATE CONSTITUTIONAL
AMENDMENT OR OTHER FORM OF INITIATIVE TO ENSURE FINAL LOCAL AUTHORITY OVER HOUSING AND LAND USE DECISIONS

Source: City of Murrieta
Concurrence of five or more cities/city officials
Cities/city officials: City of Banning; City of Calimesa; City of Canyon Lake; City of Moreno Valley; City of Norco; City of Torrance; Crystal Ruiz, Mayor, City of San Jacinto; Jessica Alexander, Mayor, City of Temecula
Referred to: Housing, Community, and Economic Development Policy Committee

WHEREAS, California cities have historically been responsible for adopting general plans and zoning regulations, reviewing housing development proposals, and providing or coordinating the streets, water, wastewater, public safety, parks, transportation, and other infrastructure and services necessary to support responsible, environmentally sound, and well-planned residential growth; and

WHEREAS, the League of California Cities is dedicated to protecting and expanding local control for municipalities across the state to ensure their orderly growth and development; and

WHEREAS, the League of California Cities recognizes that local zoning is a primary function of cities and an essential component of home rule, and that a city’s general plan should guide its land use planning and strategic decision-making free from pre-emption by the state; and

WHEREAS, increasingly prescriptive statewide housing mandates and development approval requirements can override locally adopted plans, zoning standards, and public review procedures without adequately accounting for differences that exist in each unique jurisdiction in infrastructure capacity, water availability, wildfire and evacuation risks, environmental constraints, fiscal impacts, public service needs, and community priorities; and

WHEREAS, California’s housing goals can be more effectively advanced through state funding, streamlined environmental requirements, and voluntary partnerships that support housing production while preserving the authority of locally elected officials to determine how and where housing is best planned and approved;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the General Assembly of the League of California Cities, assembled during the Annual Conference in Anaheim, California, on September 25, 2026, that the League of California Cities support the development and advancement of a state constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot- based strategies that restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use matters within municipal boundaries, including general plans, housing elements, zoning, density, design and development standards, project siting, and the approval or denial of housing development applications; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any constitutional amendment or alternative strategy should preserve the State’s authority to establish broad statewide housing goals and enforce constitutional and civil rights, fair housing requirements, building and life-safety standards, and generally applicable environmental protections, while protecting cities from state actions that compel, through funding conditions or state law, the approval of housing developments that are inconsistent with locally adopted requirements; override local zoning or density standards; or invalidate locally adopted housing or land use decisions when a city has planned in good faith to accommodate its regional housing needs allocation and maintains adequate capacity for housing at all income levels; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the League of California Cities consider establishing a statewide working group or other appropriate committee(s) to evaluate and develop a proposed constitutional amendment or other legislative, policy, or ballot-based strategies to restore and strengthen local authority over housing and land use matters including but limited to: conducting appropriate legal, fiscal, and policy analyses; engaging cities and other stakeholders; and building a statewide coalition of proponent supporters in preparation for; the November 2030 General Election, or within another reasonable time frame as determined by the working group.

– King City property listed for sale as data center site

Property in King City, Monterey County, originally purchased for marijuana cultivation is now being sold as a potential data center site.

From Monterey County Now, September 3, 2026:

“The 150 Don Bates Way property, which County Assessor records show [city council candidate Jonas] Lalehzadeh’s partner purchased for $3.5 million in 2021, has been posted for sale online with an asking price of $18 million. A real estate listing describes it as a “power-ready data center campus” opportunity with 55,000 square feet of space across five buildings.

“The campus is fully secured and gated, and the property will be delivered 100-percent vacant at the close of escrow,” according to the listing, which also notes 8.31 megawatts of power already onsite. “The property provides a compelling platform for operators seeking deployable compute capacity in Northern California without the constraints of the Silicon Valley power grid.”

A data center is not yet a permitted use of the site. “I mean, he’s not wrong. I guess it is an opportunity, but that type of use would certainly come to the Planning Commission and the Council before it was approved,” Arreola says. “My guess is it would be met with quite a bit of scrutiny.””

https://www.montereycountynow.com/svnow/news/council-candidate-sues-king-city-over-revoked-cannabis-permit-and-pitches-a-data-center/article_6b5898ab-de54-4570-b05a-ba8bf2af61bc.html

– September 18, KSCO AM 1080: data center measure rejected by Santa Cruz County, new Moss Landing BESS fire, and more

From Becky Steinbruner:

I will be discussing the [Santa Cruz County] Board of Supervisor action to reject, by a vote of 3/2, putting a measure on the 2028 local ballot that would allow voters to approve data centers in Santa Cruz County should there be an application for permitting in the future. 
The item was proposed by Supervisor Justin Cummings. He is worried a data center could potentially be developed at the site of the former Cemex Plant in Davenport.

The California State Assembly just passed legislation, now headed for the State Senate, that would address energy demands of data centers, but not much else: https://tech.yahoo.com/general/article/the-house-just-passed-a-bipartisan-data-center-bill-what-the-ratepayer-protection-act-would–and-wouldnt–do-to-protect-consumers-from-rising-energy-costs-130000413.html

There has been a plan to build a data center, combined with a desalination plant, in Moss Landing (2010-2018), known as DeepWater Desal: DeepWater Desal aiming to build desalination plant in Moss Landing. It was to use sea water to cool the data center, and use the cooling water for desalination water supplies in the region.

[Also, land in King City is being sold as a data center site https://www.montereycountynow.com/svnow/news/council-candidate-sues-king-city-over-revoked-cannabis-permit-and-pitches-a-data-center/article_6b5898ab-de54-4570-b05a-ba8bf2af61bc.html]

What do you think about data centers?  What do you think about the Santa Cruz County Supervisors?

Call in! 831-479-1080. I have invited Supervisor Justin Cummings to phone in.
Listen in 2pm-3pm Pacific Time on KSCO Radio AM 1080 and FM 104.1, 95.7 & 107.9. KOMY AM 1340. or listen live online: http://www.ksco.com/
The program will be recorded and posted on the KSCO website: http://www.ksco.com/

******Also of note for discussion will be a town hall meeting by Second District  County Supervisor Kim DeSerpa to discuss the proposed “Village on the Green” Project in Aptos on the former Par 3 Golf Course that would bring two 6-story apartment buildings and about 200 three-story townhomes to that 13-acre parcel.

September 28, 2026 – 6:00 to 7:30 pm, Twin Lakes Church (2701 Cabrillo College Drive, Aptos) – Village on the Green Community Meeting
Let us know if you can make it

AND THEN……

Bratton on KSCO (6pm-7pm) Pacific Time
TOO MANY TOO TALL AND UGLY BUILDINGS IN SANTA CRUZ???

Host Gillian Greensite will be covering a variety of local political issues,  especially those involving over-development.

— How did the City of Santa Cruz fail to involve itself in the state wide effort by CA cities to take back local control from the State’s grab over land use issues?   
— How did the CA Coastal Commission turn its back on a small but significant environmental issue at its last meeting, held here in Santa Cruz?

Call in and join the conversation!  831-479-1080.
Listen in at 6pm-7pm Pacific Time on KSCO Radio AM 1080 and . FM 104.1, 95.7 & 107.9. KOMY AM 1340.  or listen live online: http://www.ksco.com/

The program will be recorded and posted on the Bratton on KSCO webpage: http://zbsradio.com/show_detail/id/126

– New fire breaks out at Moss Landing battery facility, Friday September 18

A fire was reported at 6:15 AM on Friday, September 18, at the Moss Landing. Firefighters are on the scene. It is burning on the north side of the building.

Residents are being told to shelter in place and keep windows and doors tightly closed. Dolan Road is closed near the facility.

Press release from Never Again Moss Landing

News coverage:
https://www.ksbw.com/article/flames-moss-landing-power-plant-shelter-in-place/73788675

https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/moss-landing-power-plant-fire-september-18-2026-shelter-in-place

Monterey County webpage: https://www.readymontereycounty.org/emergency/2025-moss-landing-vistra-power-plant-fire

Becky Steinbruner will be discussing the situation as well as data centers at 2 PM on KSCO radio AM 1080 and online http://www.ksco.com/

– Write-in candidate filing period for November election is now open; deadline October 20-22

The filing period to sign up to be an official write-in candidate is now open.
Votes only count for official write-in candidates.

Period to file paperwork:
– Monterey and San Benito County: September 7 – October 20
– Santa Cruz County: September 9 – October 22

Information on how to qualify as a write-in candidate

Monterey County https://www.countyofmonterey.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/148040

San Benito County
https://www.sanbenitocounty-ca-cre.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/15938/639189473224970000
p. 35

Santa Cruz County
https://votescount.santacruzcountyca.gov/Home/Howtobeawrite-incandidate.aspx

Monterey County Elections Department states that a person cannot be a write-in candidate for federal and state offices. A person can only be a write-in for city and county offices, as well as state offices that are non-partisan. The county has a list.
https://www.countyofmonterey.gov/government/departments-a-h/elections/elections/11-03-2026-general-election