– Gilroy permits Amazon data center without public process; Monterey Park passes first California ban on data centers

In Santa Clara County, some Gilroy residents found out about a permitted Amazon data center only after it started construction due a secretive permitting process that doesn’t involve the public. NBC Bay Area reports: “A data center is a facility the city can approve for its industrial zone by the city’s community development director rather than through a public City Council process.” A city council meeting June 15 will consider how these type of permits are granted.

Meanwhile, in Monterey Park near Los Angeles, voters approved a ban on data centers after the city council placed it on the ballot, following public input.

Erin Brockovich has taken this on as a focus area with a new website studying and tracking data centers.

A coalition of Wisconsin organizations has provided a data center toolkit called Big Tech Unchecked.

Industry groups aren’t taking this lightly. An pro-data center editorial appeared in the Monterey Herald this weekend and in other California newspapers, purportedly from a “watchdog” group. Unfortunately, the group has long been associated with the tobacco industry and is an arm of the pro-business Atlas Network.

Given all the significant issues around these data centers including high energy use leading to increased electric bills for the public, extremely high water use impacting aquifers, pollution, noise, impact on farmland, use in surveillance, and health effects, Monterey Park’s action is a wise step for every community. The money and lobbying influence from giant corporations like Amazon is difficult for politicians to resist, regardless of the impacts.

Will the Monterey Bay region counties and cities to emulate Monterey Park leaders? Or will this region’s leaders allow its land, air, water, and electric grid to be compromised by data/surveillance centers?

Information on health effects:
https://ehsciences.org/data-centers-increase-electromagnetic-fields-emf-exposure/

Sources:

https://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/local/gilroy-amazon-data-center/4091984

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/06/04/california-ballot-measure-ban-data-centers-monterey-park-00949648

Click to access Big-Tech-Unchecked-Toolkit_final_rev19Dec25-resized.pdf

https://www.ocregister.com/2026/06/04/watchdog-group-busts-myths-about-california-data-centers/

https://www.tobaccotactics.org/article/taxpayers-protection-alliance/

– Santa Cruz City Council terminates contract with Flock Safety on ALPR cameras

In January 13, 2026, the city council of Santa Cruz terminated its contract with Flock Safety for its Automated License Plate Reader (ALPR) cameras. On April 7, the Monterey City Council received an annual ALPR report from the police department, with members asking many questions in light of revelations about Flock/ALPR security and how the cameras are being used, and several community members raising significant issues and opposition including ACLU rep Michelle Welsh.

https://www.montereycountynow.com/news/cover/is-the-monitoring-of-license-plates-in-monterey-county-and-beyond-a-boon-for-policing/article_65caece9-ea4d-4850-a921-c08f99155540.html
Is the monitoring of license plates in Monterey County and beyond a boon for policing or another step closer to a mass surveillance state? April 2, 2026

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/12/effs-investigations-expose-flock-safetys-surveillance-abuses-2025-review
EFF’s Investigations Expose Flock Safety’s Surveillance Abuses: 2025 in Review

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vU1-uiUlHTo
This Flock Camera Leak is like Netflix For Stalkers

https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/flock-massachusetts-and-updates
Flock Can Share Driver-Surveillance Data Even When Police Departments Opt Out, And Other Flock Developments

https://www.gettheflockout.org/
The campaign to get Flock cameras out of Santa Cruz County