– Protect landlines and Lifeline from AT&T

Updates:

There has been significant opposition to ACA-9 (see below). As a result, the author pulled it from this legislative session, but the author plans to return with it next year. In addition, comment deadlines for FCC dockets 26-123 and 26-125 have been extended.

Action Alert:

Copperline landlines are essential infrastructure. They work in power outages and in most disasters; the lines are powered, including making your phone ring, so you can reach 911 and your doctor, receive evacuation notices, stay connected to elderly and ill loved ones, and have others connect to you. This stellar service provides pinpoint location data to emergency responders when seconds count – a house invasion, a fire, someone is choking, has a heart attack, or stroke. Historically, the phone network was so reliable it was said to have “five nines” reliability — 99.999% reliable– meaning you had a dial tone for all but 5 minutes per year on average. The voice quality is superior, it’s secure, and it doesn’t drop calls. The lines also provide DSL internet. Plus, Carrier of Last Resort (COLR) status requires AT&T to provide service to everyone who asks without discrimination.

VoIP and wireless require batteries. When the battery dies, there is no connection. They have problems with reliability. They are not available everywhere or are not consistently available. Wireless devices including wireless VoIP have health and safety problems.

Lifeline is a special program for that subsidizes low income customers.

Critical Deadlines

• June 2, 12:00pm PDT – Opposition statements due to CA Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee on Assembly Constitutional Amendment 9
• June 3, 3:30pm PDT – Opposition statements due to CA Senate Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee on Assembly Constitutional Amendment 9
• June 15 – Comment deadline for FCC dockets 26-120 and 26-121
• Extended to July 7 – Comment deadline for FCC dockets 26-123 and 26-125; July 22 Reply Comment deadline

Flyers

* Communications Crisis (raise awareness of the issues and invite action): https://files.interlinked.us/att/Communications%20Crisis.pdf

* AT&T myths and facts:
https://files.interlinked.us/att/ATT%20Myths%20vs%20Facts%20color.pdf

* AT&T myths and fact, black and white:
https://files.interlinked.us/att/ATT%20Myths%20vs%20Facts%20b-w.pdf

* Combined poster with both above for 2-sided printing:
https://files.interlinked.us/att/color_combined.pdf

Also available on Save Landlines — http://www.savelandlines.org

AT&T petitions to discontinue landline and Lifeline – 26-120, 26-121, 26-123, 26-125

AT&T filed the following petitions to the FCC to eliminate landlines and Lifeline in areas of California including in the Monterey Bay region. These petitions will be automatically granted if there is no opposition.

Deadlines for filing comments/opposition:
June 15 and 22, 2026
July 7 and 22, 2026 — WC Docket 26-123, 26-125

Be sure to put the docket number and the Comp. Pol. File No. on your comments for 26-120 and 26-121.

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1052026865813/1
WC Docket No. 26-121 / Comp. Pol. File No. 2138
AT&T application to discontinue residential customers in California (comments due 6/15)

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1052088398339/1
WC Docket No. 26-120 / Comp. Pol. File No. 2137
AT&T application to discontinue business customers in California (comments due 6/15)

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/10520920917144/1
WC Docket No. 26-123
AT&T petition for forbearance from ETC including Lifeline (comments due 6/22)

https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/1052056507747/1
WC Docket No. 26-125
AT&T petition for preemption from California rules and requirements and declaratory ruling (comments due 6/22)

Because the FCC streamlined the process to allow carriers to discontinue landline service as part of a “technology transition”, these requests are automatically granted in most cases. Filing oppositions is the only way to protest AT&T discontinuance plans; it stops the FCC from automatically granting the applications. If they receive opposition, the FCC will remove AT&T’s application from “streamlining” and perform a review.

These applications contain the notice mailed 5/20 to customers.

Filing Oppositions or Comments is not difficult. To submit them to the FCC, you can prepare a letter and upload it (ECFS Standard Filing) or type/paste a comment into ECFS Express Filing.

Instructions for the longer Standard Filing form:
Proceeding: Start typing the docket number such as 26-123  and the docket title will pop up . Click on the title and it will fill in the docket name.
Fill in starred lines.
Type of Filing: Click on the box and choose Comment or Opposition (the FCC says either category is okay)
Address of: Click on box and choose whichever is correct
Fill out remaining red starred items.
Upload your document(s).
Click in yellow box.
Click blue “Continue to Review Screen” and submit from there.

Postponed until 2027 Assembly Constitutional Amendment 9
(ACA-9) (Boerner)

ACA-9 would eliminate key CPUC regulatory functions over utilities, remove telecom companies from being considered public utilities and remove them from CPUC regulatory oversight in the California Constitution, and create a new expensive agency for broadband and telecom.
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260ACA9

Senate hearings start June 8 June 9; deadlines begin this week to submit position letters of protest. Each committee gives the deadlines for submitting position letters before each hearing. The current bill may be amended. If amended, the committees will only accept letters that are based on the most recent version. Check the link above for any amendments.

1) CANCELLED Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee hearing June 8.
Opposition statements must be sent in by June 2 at noon.
https://seuc.senate.ca.gov/committeehome

2 CANCELLED Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee hearing June 9, 9:30 AM.

https://selc.senate.ca.gov/system/files/2026-06/6.9.26-hearing-packet.pdf
Elections and Constitutional Amendments Committee Analysis: includes support and opposition – p. 21-26. The analysis is flawed, because it leaves out key actions by the amendment
(Formal opposition position letters were due for this analysis on June 3 at 3:30 pm. )
https://selc.senate.ca.gov/content/policy-support-and-opposition-letters

The Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications analysis is the most thorough review of questions and issues with ACA-9. After the hearing was cancelled, it was taken down from the Senate website, presumably because the bill might be amended. You can read it here.

Contact senators, particularly those on the committees and educate them. Constitutional amendments require a 2/3 vote to pass.

CPUC R.24-06-012 docket on COLR and telephone service

AT&T has requested to eliminate its COLR obligations. The CPUC is in its final stages of reviewing COLR rules to set new rules or possibly discontinue all or most Carriers of Last Resort (COLR) in California. COLR means that these companies are required to provide basic phone service to all who request it. That service has meant landlines.

If AT&T’s COLR designation is eliminated, there will be no protection for the public because there are no functionally equivalent alternatives to the traditional landline phones, especially in rural and remote areas, but also in urban areas. “Reception” is not an issue for landlines, but it is a problem for wireless systems. Fiber isn’t available in many places, and those systems must have batteries. Non-COLR companies cannot be compelled to offer service to an applicant or offer landline service. Many people may have no coverage at all if AT&T and others decommission copper service, and that also includes those disabled by electromagnetic sensitivity and other EMF-sensitive disabilities who cannot tolerate wireless exposure.

 The CPUC Staff Proposal  proposes eliminating critical service elements of basic voice service, allowing carriers to more easily fulfill their COLR obligations via alternative services instead of copper. The proposal also significantly de-emphasizes voice and shifts to focusing on broadband connectivity instead.

Submit public comments by clicking the Public Comments tab at the top o the Docket page, and then clicking “Submit Public Comment”. Document files can also be emailed to public.advisor@cpuc.ca.gov

Docket:
https://apps.cpuc.ca.gov/apex/f?p=401:56::::RP,57,RIR:P5_PROCEEDING_SELECT:R2406012

Documents:
https://apps.cpuc.ca.gov/apex/f?p=401:57::::::

Consumer parties include EMF Safety Network, TURN, Center for Accessible Technology, Rural County Representatives of California, and the Public Advocates Office at the CPUC (Cal Advocates). Their comments provide information on some of the important issues and considerations.

The proceeding began in 2024 and a proposed decision is expected at any time. The judge just issued a ruling to AT&T to clarify contradictory statements.

AT&T lawsuit against the State of California

On May 20, AT&T sued the California Public Utilities Commission and California Attorney General for requiring AT&T to provide basic voice service to all Californians. AT&T argues the CPUC’s rules are preempted by the FCC in its Report and Order on “Reducing Barriers to Network Improvements and Service Changes” (WC Dockets 25-209 and 25-208), adopted March 26th.

Lawsuit  |  AT&T petitions to the FCC to: preempt California rules and requirements  |  receive forbearance from ETC/Lifeline in California  |  disconnect 184,000 residential and 15,000 business customers as soon as June 1, 2027

Call the California Attorney General
1-800-952-5225 (916-210-6276 out of state)
Press 1 for English or 2 for Spanish, then press 7 to leave a message for the Attorney General.
For example: I am asking the attorney general to defend the rights of hundreds of thousands of Californians to reliable phone service by challenging AT&T’s petition to disconnect 200,000 customers and also fight AT&T’s lawsuit against you and the CPUC. The alternatives that AT&T claims are sufficient are inferior and inadequate (and not even functional everywhere), and if AT&T wins this lawsuit, thousands of Californians may never have reliable phone service again, so we need you to make this issue a top priority. Please also challenge the FCC order asserting preemption of state rules like COLR.

–

Extensive information is available on these and other landline dockets in the United States at https://phreaknet.org/action

Also, savelandlines.org

Every effort is to provide accurate information. This information is being updated as new developments occur.